Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts

Monday, March 21, 2016

Leaked Documents Expose the TTIP Trade Deal as a Subversive Imperial Scam

Liberty Blitzkrieg | Michael Krieger | Posted Friday Mar 18, 2016




At least 150,000 people marched in Berlin on Saturday in protest against a planned free trade deal between Europe and the United States that they say is anti-democratic and will lower food safety, labor and environmental standards.

Organizers – an alliance of environmental groups, charities and opposition parties – said 250,000 people had taken part in the rally against free trade deals with both the United States and Canada, far more than they had anticipated.

Opposition to the so-called Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has risen over the past year in Germany, with critics fearing the pact will hand too much power to big multinationals at the expense of consumers and workers.

– From the post: Merkel “Surprised” as Hundreds of Thousands March in Berlin Against TTIP “Corporate Dictatorship”

The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is under total assault here in these United States, as the general public has become aware that these fake trade deals are merely oppressive power grabs written by lobbyists to benefit multinational corporations at the expense of the general public.


Less well known to the American public is a similar scam targeting Europe, known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Recently leaked documents have highlighted its profound dangers.

The Independent reports:

The European Commission will be obliged to consult with US authorities before adopting new legislative proposals following passage of a controversial series of trade negotiations being carried out mostly in secret.

A leaked document obtained by campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and the Independent from the ongoing EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations reveals the unelected Commission will have authority to decide in which areas there should be cooperation with the US – leaving EU member states and the European Parliament further sidelined.

The leaked document concerns the “regulatory cooperation” chapter of the talks, which the European Union says will result in “cutting red tape for EU firms without cutting corners”. It shows a labyrinth of procedures that could tie up any EU proposals that go against US interests, according to analysis by CEO.

The plans revealed by the document will give the US regulatory authorities a “questionable role” in Brussels lawmaking and weaken the European Parliament, CEO argues.

Nick Dearden, director of the Global Justice Now campaign group, said: “The leak absolutely confirms our fears about TTIP. It’s all about giving big business more power over a very wide range of laws and regulations. In fact, business lobbies are on record as saying they want to co-write laws with governments – this gets them a step closer. This isn’t an ‘add on’ or a small part of TTIP – it’s absolutely central.”

Mr Dearden said it was “scary” that the US could get the power to challenge and amend European regulations before elected European politicians have had the chance to debate them.

Referring to the imminent EU referendum, he said: “We’re talking about sovereignty at the moment in this country – it’s difficult to imagine a more serious threat to our sovereignty than this trade deal.”

All in all, the extent to which big business will be able to influence regulations under these proposals is a serious threat to democracy as we know it.

Considering Europe is already just a vessel state of the American imperial oligarchy, I guess we may as well put it in writing.

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Iran snubs Doha proposal, won't freeze oil output

AP | By ALI AKBAR DAREINI | February 17, 2016


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran appeared Wednesday to back a plan laid out by four influential oil producers to cap their crude output if others do the same, though it offered no indication that it has any plans to follow suit itself.


The agreement reached in Doha the day before by Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Venezuela is aimed at stabilizing global oil prices, which recently plunged to less than $30 a barrel, a 13-year low. But Iran is keen to ramp up exports to regain market share now that sanctions related to its nuclear program have been lifted under a landmark agreement.

"Iran supports any measure to boost oil prices," Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh said after talks with his counterparts from Iraq, Venezuela and Qatar.

"The decision taken to freeze the production ceiling of OPEC and non-OPEC members to stabilize and boost prices is also supported by us," he added, in comments posted on the ministry's website late Wednesday.

Iran's envoy to OPEC, Mahdi Asali, had earlier blamed the fall in prices on oversupply, and said it was up to Saudi Arabia and others to cut production. He said the four nations that participated at the Doha gathering could stabilize oil prices on their own -- if they cut their production by 2 million barrels a day.

"These countries increased their production by 4 million barrels when Iran was under sanctions," Asali was quoted as saying by the Shargh daily. "Now it's primarily their responsibility to help restore balance on the market. There is no reason for Iran to do so."

The four countries made their announcement following an unexpected meeting in the Qatari capital that pointedly did not include Iran. They agreed to act only if other producers made similar freezes.

Iran has previously said it hopes to put another 500,000 barrels a day on the market. Figures from the International Energy Agency show it pumped 2.9 million barrels daily in December, before sanctions were lifted.

Iran used to export 2.3 million barrels per day, but its crude exports fell to 1 million in 2012, when sanctions were tightened.

On Tuesday, Iran's oil minister said it had no intention of giving up its share of the market. Zanganeh acknowledged that global markets are "oversupplied," but said Iran "will not overlook its quota," according to comments carried by his ministry's Shana news service.

Even with Iran's cooperation, it was unclear if the Doha plan would be enough to put a floor under prices.

The United Arab Emirates' energy minister, Suhail Mohamed al-Mazrouei, refused on Wednesday to discuss the Doha proposal after giving a keynote address at a Dubai conference in which he mentioned low oil prices only in passing.

"I will only talk about this conference," he said, before smiling and walking away from reporters' shouted questions.

He later took to Twitter to say his country's oil policy "is open to cooperate with all producers toward mutual interest of the market stability and we are optimistic on the future."

Kuwait, another Gulf OPEC member, signaled it was willing to go along with the Doha plan.

Anas al-Saleh, who is Kuwait's deputy premier, finance minister and acting oil minister, said in a statement that his country was committed to the proposal if others join in.

"Kuwait hopes the agreement would provide a positive atmosphere for oil prices, and for the market to regain balance, and calls on all to support stability of markets," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Jon Gambrell and Adam Schreck in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, contributed to this report.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

SYRIAN REFUGEES ADMITTED TO US SINCE PARIS ATTACK: 602 MUSLIMS, 2 CHRISTIANS

Patrick Goodenough | CNS News - FEBRUARY 16, 2016

IMAGE CREDITS: FLICKR, SYRIAFREEDOM.



The government has admitted 605 Syrian refugees for resettlement in the United States since last November’s Paris terrorist attack, two of whom are Christians.


The rest are 589 Sunni Muslims, 10 Shia Muslims, three other Muslims, and one refugee identified in State Department Refugee Processing Center data as “other religion.”

At the same time, the proportion of Christians among the total cohort of Syrian refugees admitted into the U.S. since the conflict began five years ago has now dropped below two percent.

Just 55 Christians (1.9 percent) are among the 2,769 Syrian refugees admitted since March 2011, while a large majority – 2,594 (93.6 percent) – has been Sunni Muslims.

Christians accounted for about 10 percent of Syria’s population when the civil war began and Sunni Muslims for an estimated 74 percent.

Christians and other non-Muslim minorities have been targeted specifically by ISIS and other radical groups, and monitoring group estimate that more than 700,000 Christians have fled Syria since then.

Other non-Muslims among the Syrian refugees admitted to the U.S. since the war began include small numbers of Baha’i (2), Yazidis (1), Jehovah’s Witnesses (8), Zoroastrians (6), atheists (3) and Syrians who have self-identified as having no religion (7).

The administration has rejected calls by some Republican lawmakers, andsome GOP presidential candidates, for Syrian Christians to be prioritized in the refugee admission process.

The ISIS terrorist attack in Paris on November 13 fueled concerns that the terrorist group was exploiting the flow of refugees and migrants as cover to send jihadists into the West to carry out attacks.

French authorities said two of the attackers had been carrying fake Syrian passports and warned European Union partners that “some terrorists are trying to get into our countries and commit criminal acts by mixing in with the flow of migrants and refugees.”

Last Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper affirmed during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing that ISIS has done so.

“Isn’t it already proven that Mr. Baghdadi is sending people with this flow of refugees that are terrorists that – in order to inflict further attacks on Europe and the United States?” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) asked him, referring to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

“That’s correct,” Clapper replied. “That’s one technique they’ve used is taking advantage of the torrent of migrants to insert operatives into that flow.”

In addition, he continued, ISIS has become “pretty skilled at [producing] phony passports, so they can travel ostensibly as legitimate travelers as well.”

In December, House Homeland Security Committee chairman Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said the U.S. intelligence community “has identified already individuals tied to terrorist organizations in Syria that want to exploit and get into the United States through the refugee process.”

Thursday, February 11, 2016

The Telegraph Fears a Populist Uprising

Brushfyre | James Menendez | February 11, 2016


Allister Heath, deputy Editor for the Telegraph, penned an article in today's Telegraph warning those who ally with globalism that a populist uprising of right-leaning affiliation could be disastrous for the left, the global banks and their ilk.


I literally read each tantalizing word of this article this morning with my mouth agape. I couldn't believe the admissions that one by one were being exposed via the ranting of this globalist. Let's run through them, shall we?

'We' can survive another collapse


We are too fragile, fiscally as well as psychologically. Our economies, cultures and polities are still paying a heavy price for the Great Recession; another collapse, especially were it to be accompanied by a fresh banking bailout by the taxpayer, would trigger a cataclysmic, uncontrollable backlash.

The public, whose faith in elites and the private sector was rattled after 2007-09, would simply not wear it. Its anger would be so explosive, so-all encompassing that it would threaten the very survival of free trade, of globalisation and of the market-based economy. There would be calls for wage and price controls, punitive, ultra-progressive taxes, a war on the City and arbitrary jail sentences.
Emphasis mine. By 'We' he means 'them', that is: the globalists. It is extremely apparent in the article that the author does not see himself as one of 'us'. He speaks as if he is talking to his bankster globalist masters, supplicating himself prostrate before them saying 'your way is the best'.

Politicians would become 'Extremist' and 'Populist'

Trump wants to make America Great again.

The fact that Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders both won their respective New Hampshire primaries is certainly one remarkable indication of the state of mind of many US political activists

The key thing here is that the author is not interested in making America great again. He wants the Fed to continue it globalised central bank policy of managing inflation by printing vast sums of cash for the banks (not you). 

More of the Status Quo

More from the article:

History never repeats itself exactly, but the last time a recession was met by pure, unadulterated populism was in the Thirties, when the Americans turned a stock market crash and a series of monetary policy blunders into a depression. President Herbert Hoover signed into law the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, dreamt up by two economically illiterate Republican senators, slapping massive taxes on the imports of 20,000 goods and triggering a global trade war. It was perhaps the most economically destructive piece of legislation ever devised, and it took until the Nineties before the damage was finally erased.
Emphasis mine. Let's make sure the banks keep getting their way. He uses the example of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. This Act of Congress was great for America but really bad for the globalists. The author mentions that this disaster wasn't fixed until the 1990's. What happened in 1990's that would have bolstered globalism and consequently the destruction of American jobs? That's right: NAFTA and GATT. The 'giant sucking sound' Ross Perot warned us about.

If it is not working, why continue failed policies?


The question one has to ask is: why, if the current policies that this author is defending have failed would he continue to argue for the same policies? Make no mistake these policies will lead to the systematic downfall of every country that adopts them. Perhaps then this is the plan: the destruction of every world economy so that one economy can rise above them and take over all the broken countries. A one-world government for instance. That is what globalism is after all, isn't it? One world the central bankers in charge?



Markets Around The World Are Crashing; Gold Soars

Zero Hedge | by Tyler Durden | 02/11/201



Yesterday morning, when musing on the day's key event namely Yellen's congressional testimony, we dismissed the most recent bout of European bank euphoria which we said "will be brief if not validated by concrete actions, because while central banks have the luxury of jawboning, commercial banks are actually burning through funds - rapidly at that - and don't have the luxury of hoping for the best while doing nothing." This morning DB has wiped out all of yesterday's gain.

As for Yellen's testimony, we said that "she can send stocks reeling with one word out of place" - the word in question being not what she said but what she didn't say, in this case not being dovish enough and thus supportive enough of risk. And the consequence is there for all to see as soon as their trading terminal boots up: everything is crashing (with the exception of China which is on holiday, and Japan which was mercifully closed yesterday). Here are the highlights:
  • S&P 500 futures down 1.8% to 1814
  • Stoxx 600 down 3.4% to 304
  • FTSE 100 down 2.6% to 5525
  • DAX down 2.9% to 8760
  • German 10Yr yield down 7bps to 0.18%
  • MSCI Asia Pacific up 0.1% to 117
  • Hang Seng down 3.8% to 18546
  • S&P/ASX 200 up 1% to 4821
  • US 10-yr yield down 5bps to 1.62%
  • Dollar Index down 0.42% to 95.49
  • WTI Crude futures down 2.9% to $26.65
  • Brent Futures down 1.7% to $30.31
  • Gold spot up 1.9% to $1,220
  • Silver spot up 1.5% to $15.50
It all started in Hong Kong where as we reported last night, the Hang Seng Index plunged 3.9%, catching up with the week’s selloff as the market reopened from a holiday, and capping its worst Lunar New Year start since 1994.

Japan’s Nikkei Stock Average and China’s Shanghai Composite Index were both closed, but investors continued to pile into the yen, as virtually every carry trade has fallen apart in the past month. As a result, the dollar was down 1.8% against the yen at ¥111.28 after sliding below 111 briefly, a massive gain of nearly 300 pips in the past 24 hours, sending the Yen to the lowest level since October 2014 when Kuroda expanded QE.



In the first 9 days of this month, the Yen has risen 985 pips: That is biggest advance, in pip terms, since Oct. 1998; that month, the currency rose 1,563 pips from 130.03 to 114.40 over nine trading days ended Oct. 19. Elsewhere, the euro was up 0.4% against the dollar at $1.1325, its highest since October.

It wasn't just FX: European stocks slid toward their lowest since September 2013 and U.S. futures indicated equities will open nearly 2% and put the recent support level of 1812 in danger of being breached.

Among the key European movers was Societe Generale which tumbled 12% after reporting that quarterly profit missed estimates as earnings at the investment bank fell and it set aside provisions for potential legal costs. Elsewhere, Rio Tinto Group slipped 4.1% as it scrapped its progressive dividend policy and set out new spending cuts.

“Financial markets are repricing for a global growth slowdown,” said Tim Condon, head of Asian research at ING Groep NV in Singapore. "Expectations that monetary policy would be able to do much have diminished considerably.”

Just as troubling is that Swedish shares slid and the OMX Stockholm 30 Index dropped 3.% despite Sweden’s central bank going even deeper into NIRP, cutting its interest rate from -0.35% to -0.5%, lower than the expected -0.45%. The yen leaped to its highest in more than a year. Major sovereign bond markets rallied, pushing U.K. gilt yields to a record low. Gold rose beyond $1,200 an ounce, while U.S. oil traded below $27 a barrel.

This is troubling, because as Bloomberg notes, "signals by central banks from Europe to Japan that additional stimulus is at the ready are failing to ease investor concern that global growth will keep slowing." This means that it is no longer just a joke that central banks are losing credibility: judging by the markets' reaction it is all too real. To this point, yesterday we wondered if Yellen will make bad news good news again. She has failed:

“Over the last few years when we got bad news, equity markets would rally because they would interpret this as potential for central banks to go more dovish,” said Mohit Kumar, head of rates strategy at Credit Agricole SA’s corporate and investment bank unit in London. “Now that correlation is shifting to bad news is actually bad news. Investors are concerned over central banks’ policy options given the market is driven by factors over which they have little or no control over.”

Imagine that: investors investing without a central bank to hold their hand.

Among other things crashing: bond yields - the 10Year plunged to 1.62%, the lowest level since May 2013 as the entire treasury complex prepares for NIRP.

Not everything was crashing however: as central planners lost control, the dull, boring yellow metal known as gold was up about 4% overnight and was trading at $1240 moments ago, well above the level it hit when the Fed ended QE3, and outperforming every asset class in that time period.

Also surging are peripheral European yields, most notably in Portugal and Greece both overf 30 bps wider, as suddenly 7 years of financial dirt kicked under the rug thanks to central bank jawboning and futile actions, re-emerges for all to see, and to be reminded that nothing was ever fixed!

In short, the market is threatening Yellen with a crash ahead of her 2nd testimony today this time before the Senate. We doubt she will comply, so the market will just have to try harder.
Here are the top news from overnight:
  • Yellen Suggests Fed May Delay Rate Rises, Not Abandon Them: Fed chair non-committal on possible use of negative rates
  • Assessing Yellen’s Warning That Markets Pose a Threat to Economy: Bear markets usually come ~9 months before recessions
  • Mylan Slumps, Meda Soars on $7.2 Billion ‘Wealth Destroying’ Bid: Price represents a 92% premium to Meda’s close on Wednesday
  • Sanders Raises $7.1 Million After New Hampshire Win: comes after Tuesday’s victory speech declaration that he was “going to hold a fundraiser right here, right now, across America”
  • Clinton Reassesses Campaign With Thursday Debate Next Test: New Hampshire margin for Sanders puts Clinton on defensive
  • Twitter Troubles Deepen as Lack of User Growth Threatens Sales: Dorsey says making product easier to use is top priority
  • Amazon to Repurchase as Much as $5 Billion of Its Own Shares: co. commented in filing yday
  • U.K. Bond Yield Drops to Record-Low as Investors Seek Safety: U.K. plans to auction 30-year securities later Thursday
  • Swedish Central Bank Unleashes More Stimulus After Krona Warning: Sees scope to cut repo rate further
  • ‘Brexit’ Vote Is Clouding U.K.’s Growth Outlook, CBI Says: Business lobby downgrades 2016 growth forecast to 2.3%
  • Gold Soars Above $1,200 as Fed Chief Signals Go-Slow on Rates: set for 9th gain in 10 days on Fed chief’s remarks
  • Oil Above $55 Is a Long-Term Inevitability, Maersk CEO Says: sees global demand pushing oil price higher over time
  • Worst Still Ahead for Mining Industry After Losing $1.4 Trillion: This year looks even worse for an industry decimated by the commodities slump
  • SocGen Slumps as Quarterly Profit Hurt by Securities Drop: Bank says ROE target for this year of 10% is ‘unconfirmed’
  • As Zika Spreads, an Unexpected Winner in Brazil’s Mosquito War: Scandal-plagued leader Rousseff seeks unity to fight virus
In today's closer look at regional markets, we start in Asia, where equities traded broadly in negative territory amid the soft lead on Wall Street, coupled with the persistent credit risk fears adding to the risk-off sentiment. As such, the iTraxx Asia index ex Japan, an index tracking the value of CDS's in Asia, widened by 6bps to the highest level since Aug'13. The Hang Seng (-3.9%) returned from its elongated break to play catch up with the recent global equity and oil rout, consequently energy names were the notable laggard. While South Korea had also entered the fray as the Kospi (-2.5%) slipped amid the rising geopolitical tensions with North Korea after launching a satellite into space. ASX 200 (+1.0%) bucked the trend with stocks supported by a slew of strong earnings. As a reminder, Japanese markets were closed due to National Foundation Day.

Top Asian News
  • Hong Kong Stocks Fall in Worst Start to Lunar New Year Since ’94: Global equity rout deepens during 3-day trading break
  • Bass Says China Bank Losses May Top 400% of Subprime Crisis: Hedge fund manager says 10% asset loss would cut equity by $3.5t
  • Rio Will Cut Dividend After Metals Rout Sees Profit Tumble: World’s 2nd-biggest mining co. to reduce spending by another $3b
  • Billionaire’s Fund Sees India Extending Bear-Market Losses: Hedge fund awaits further 10% drop in values to turn bullish
  • SBI’s Profit Growth Slows to Four-Year Low on Bad Loan Surge: Provisions for bad loans almost double in the December quarter
  • North Korea to Shut Industrial Park, Freeze South Korean Assets: To expel South Korean personnel from Gaeseong complex
In Europe we have so far seen the most volatile day of what has been a very rocky 2016. Risk off sentiment is extremely apparent across asset class, with equities seeing a significant sell off so far today. Euro Stoxx 50 is lower by around 3.0% this morning, with financials and energy names the most significant underperformers as has been the case throughout the last 6 weeks. Financials have been weighed on by SocGen (-12.4%) who have suffered significantly in the wake of their earnings, while Deutsche Bank's woes have not been forgotten (-5.7%), with the iTraxx Sub Financials index widening this morning by around 36bps, suggesting a rise in financials' CDS. The heightened fear has also seen significant gains in fixed income, with Bunds higher by around 100 ticks so far today, while UK 10-year Gilt yields dropped to a record low this morning.
European Top News
  • Glencore Copper Production Falls as Franco to Buy Metals Stream: 4Q zinc production fell 18%, coal declined 17%
  • Zurich Insurance Quarterly Loss Misses Estimates on Claims: Company expects to miss its return-on-equity target for year
  • Total’s Earnings Beat Estimates on Oil Production, Refining: Co. maintains dividend, offers payout in new stock
  • Adidas Sees Higher Profit After 2015 Earnings Beat Estimates: Raises sales, profit outlook for this year
  • BG Group Trades Final Time Before Merger: To delist from exchanges on Feb. 15 as Shell takes over; BG’s value has grown ninefold since company’s creation in 1997
  • Mediobanca Second-Quarter Profit Declines on One-Time Charges: Fiscal 2Q profit falls 24%
  • Nokia Earnings Increase on Cost Focus as Sales Fall Short: Projects 2016 “headwinds” as demand slows
  • Publicis Sales Rise on Digital, North American Business: CEO Maurice Levy forecasts ‘modest’ growth this year
  • Rio Will Cut Dividend After Metals Rout Sees Profit Tumble: To reduce spending by another $3 billion
  • Natixis Buys Stake in U.S. Boutique as CEO Seeks Advisory Growth: To acquire 51% of Peter J. Solomon
In FX, the dominant move as noted above was the USD/JPY sell off, which has impacted on all the major currency pairs. This has contributed to the risk off theme, with stock markets in Europe in the red again and US futures pointing to a 5th consecutive day of losses. From the mid 112.00's, the spot JPY rate was slammed through the 111.00's to print 110.99, with no sign of the MoF or BoJ.
Cross/JPY rates were dragged lower, with EUR/JPY trading through the key 126.00 level, but with limited momentum through here as EUR/USD rallied to new recent highs just above 1.1350. No such tempering in GBP and AUD, though the former JPY rate held 160.00 despite a heavy turnaround in Cable. EUR/GBP posted new highs through .7850. AUD/USD losses through .7000 contributed to sub 80.00 (and 79.00) in AUD/JPY. USD/CAD has tested 1.4000, but holds off the figure as yet.

WTI and Brent crude futures have ticked lower in European trade with WTI Mar'16 futures notably breaking below the USD 27.00 level, near 12 year lows despite the headline figure released in yesterday's DoE inventories showing a surprise drawdown . However, some analysts have noted that Cushing OK crude inventories showed a surprise build, and the market is ready to pounce on any signs that the glut is expanding.

Gold has benefited from safe haven bids in Asian and European trade and is over USD 25.00/oz higher on the session, at its highest level since May 2015. The World Gold Council have noted that the upward trend in gold looks set to continue as buying by central banks and Chinese investors will bolster prices. Analysts have noted that the following year could see a surge of M&A activity, as gold miners have plenty of liquidity with surging gold prices and diversified miners look to offload assets, due to softness in industrial metals.

Turning to the day ahead, we get the latest weekly initial jobless claims data due in the US. The focus will again be on Fed Chair Yellen when she is due to speak in front of the Senate at 10am. Her prepared remarks will mirror what she said yesterday so the focus will be on the Q&A: for the sake of the market she better be much more dovish.

Bulletin Headline Summary from Bloomberg and RanSquawk
  • Today has seen the most volatile day of what has been a very rocky 2016, risk off sentiment is extremely apparent across asset class
  • The FX markets have been dominated by the USD/JPY sell off, which has impacted on all the major currency pairs
  • Looking ahead: highlights include: Fed's Yellen appear before Senate, weekly jobs data and earnings from PepsiCo
  • Treasuries higher in overnight trading as European equity markets plunge, WIT oil drops below $27 a barrel; Treasury to sell $15b U.S. 30Y notes, WI 2.465% vs 2.905% in January, lowest 30Y auction stop since 2.880% in August 2015.
  • Financial markets are signaling that investors have lost faith in policy makers’ ability to support the global economy. European stocks slid toward their lowest since September 2013 and U.S. futures indicated equities will open lower
  • Sweden’s central bank lowered its key interest rate even further below zero to -0.5% and said it’s prepared to use its full toolbox of measures as it battles to revive inflation and keep the krona from appreciating
  • European banks and insurers’ subordinated credit risk rose to the highest since March 2013 after disappointing earnings at Societe Generale and Zurich Insurance Group renewed concerns about financial companies’ profits; Societe Generale, France’s second-largest bank by market value, posted fourth-quarter profit that missed analysts’ estimates as earnings at the investment bank dropped and it set aside provisions for potential legal costs. The shares plunged
  • With populist and anti-EU forces surging across the region, should David Cameron leave next week’s European Union summit with a deal to overhaul the terms of Britain’s membership, many of his counterparts will dig out their own wishlists
  • Kyle Bass, the hedge fund manager who successfully bet against mortgages during the subprime crisis, said China’s banking system may see losses of more than four times those suffered by U.S. banks during the last crisis
  • The world is so awash with crude, the boss of BP Plc said people will be filling their “swimming pools” with it by the end of the year
  • Sovereign 10Y bond yields mostly lower, Greece (+31bp), Portugal (+31bp) higher; European stocks plunge, Asian markets mostly closed for holiday, Hang Seng drops; U.S. equity-index futures fall. Crude oil drops, copper, gold rise
US Event Calendar
  • 8:30am: Initial Jobless Claims, Feb. 6., est. 280k (prior 285k); Continuing Claims, Jan. 30, est. 2.245m (prior 2.255m)
  • 8:45am: Bloomberg Feb. United States Economic Survey
  • 9:45am: Bloomberg Consumer Comfort, Feb. 7 (prior 44.2)
  • 1:00pm: U.S. to sell $15b 30Y bonds
  • Central Banks
  • 10:00am: Fed’s Yellen testifies to Senate committee
  • 5:30pm: Reserve Bank of Australia’s Stevens testifies in Parliament
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
Looking at the latest in Asia this morning, markets in Korea and Hong Kong are open for the first time this week, although are largely playing catch up with the big falls that we’ve seen for risk assets in that time. The Hang Seng is currently down a steep -4.03% while the Kospi has dropped -2.97%. Mainland China exchanges are still closed although the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI) is down nearly 5%. Markets in Japan are closed for a public holiday. There’s better news in Australia where the ASX is currently +0.95%, although the Aus iTraxx index is 4bps wider as we go to print. US equity market futures are weaker while Gold has surged above $1,200.

Moving on. As we highlighted at the top, yesterday saw the 2s10s Treasury yield curve go below 100bps for first time since December 2007. After spiking as high as 1.772% in early trading, the benchmark 10y yield tumbled into the close, eventually finishing over 5bps lower on the day at 1.668% and just off the 12-month lows. 2y yields finished unchanged at 0.686% meaning the spread of 98bps is the lowest since the 6th December 2007. This is one of our favourite lead indicators of the business and default cycle and the flattening that has occurred in recent years is one of the reasons we think credit conditions have been tightening for a few quarters now and why our default models have been showing a continued pick-up in defaults into 2017-2018. To be fair the last four recessions have not started until the yield curve (2s10s) has inverted. We're still some way off that but the fact that we're at the flattest for over 8 years is a warning sign.

There was finally some good news to report for European equity markets yesterday as the Stoxx 600 (+1.87%) benefited from a financials-led (Banks +4.42%) rebound to close up for the first time this month. Having been heavily hit in recent days the IBEX (+2.73%) and FTSE MIB (+5.03%) finally got some much needed relief. European credit indices also had a better day although did finish well off their tights. The iTraxx senior and sub-financials indices ended up 5bps and 13bps tighter respectively which helped Main in particular close nearly 2.5bps tighter, although the index had been closer to 8bps tighter pre-Yellen.

Staying with credit, our US credit strategists published their latest note earlier this week (Chickens Come Home to Roost, 8 Feb 2016) wherein they construct a proprietary dataset to forecast expected US default rates. The team uses index transition data to capture all forms of default – bankruptcies, out-of-court restructurings and distressed exchanges – to build a robust market-based dataset that is more detailed, precise and timely than that available from ratings agencies. The most striking revelation of the data is that DM HY commodity names appear to already be in a full cycle, with issuer-weighted default rates at 15.9% (14.9% par).

Assuming that commodity defaults rise to 20% for the year ahead and that ex-commodity defaults hold steady at 4% as they forecast, the overall default rate for DM USD HY (Commodity weight: ~20%) would hit 7.2% - magnitudes higher than the 1.85% default rate seen last year! Rising credit pressures across a spectrum of non-commodity industries and downward pressure on recovery rates in energy bonds should only serve to further compound already apparent risks.

Wrapping up, yesterday’s economic data was focused on what was a pretty soft set of industrial production reports in Europe. Data for France (-1.6% mom vs. +0.3% expected), Italy (-0.7% mom vs. +0.3% expected) and the UK (-1.1% mom vs. -0.1% expected) all missed relative to expectations, while manufacturing reports for France and the UK were also soft for the month of December.

Turning to the day ahead, there’s not alot for us to report with no economic data of note due out in Europe and just the latest weekly initial jobless claims data due in the US this afternoon. Instead the focus will again be on Fed Chair Yellen when she is due to speak in front of the Senate at 3pm GMT. Her prepared remarks could mirror what she said yesterday so the focus will be on the Q&A. Away from this we’ll also get the Riksbank’s latest monetary policy announcement where current economist expectations are for another cut in the main policy rate deeper into negative territory (10bps cut to -0.45%). Earnings wise today we have 20 S&P 500 companies set to report including AIG and PepsiCo.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Deutsche Bank Stock Crashes To Record Low

Zero Hedge | February 9, 2016


Deutsche Bank's stock is crashing and signs point to the same issues that caused Lehman Brother's to crash in 2008 which was the beginning of the 2008 financial collapse in the US. 

Robots will force experts to find other routes to the top

FT | Andrew Hill | February 8, 2016





There is a point in any talk about the automated future of the professions when the audience visibly relaxes.


It comes when futurists concede that a few expert lawyers, consultants or accountants will still be needed, even after cheaper, more efficient computer systems have taken over many of their juniors’ tasks.


It happened last week at a lecture by Richard and Daniel Susskind, which the organisers claimed was the largest ever gathering of senior managers in UK professional services firms.

The father-and-son authors of The Future of the Professions predicted radical change in the sector. But the tense scepticism in the room dissipated as each senior partner or director quietly acknowledged he or she would be a survivor, even if algorithms and artificial intelligence swept away the consultant or solicitor in the next seat.

This cohort may well reach retirement unscathed — and without much incentive to alter how they work. As Richard Susskind told me afterwards, “it’s hard to convince a room full of millionaires that they have got their model wrong”. But change is coming. The main difference of opinion is over its pace and extent.

You can already ask Kim, a legal “virtual assistant” launched by Riverview Law, for help managing your caseload, or get Ross, IBM Watson’s “super intelligent attorney”, to research the entire body of law in seconds. But a crystal-ball-gazing report by The Law Society, the trade body for solicitors in England and Wales, expects the impact of this type of automation to level off by 2020.

The society’s Stephen Denyer told last week’s gathering that clients were not only looking for practical counsel, but for “negotiating skills, judgment, ethical standards, and reassurance about the direction they’re taking”.

Fine. But how will the senior partners of the future achieve that level of wisdom when machines are doing the tasks that allow them to build and hone their expertise?

Take financial journalism. I spent three years as a trainee building confidence and skill by churning out news about corporate earnings. This is precisely the type of report that, quite rightly, Associated Press now produces automatically, in partnership with a company called — ominously for all columnists — Automated Insights.

Another parallel is aviation, where crashes often trigger fears that autopilots are undermining human skills. Interviewed last year about the 2009 Air France crash, Delmar Fadden, Boeing’s former chief of cockpit technology, told Vanity Fair that, having automated 98 per cent of pilots’ routine work, “we really worry about the tasks we ask them to do just occasionally”.

The answer is not to halt the march of the robots. Indeed, technology is part of the solution. Novice astronauts are not trained by sending them on repeated costly moonshots. They practise the tasks and challenges they will face in carefully designed simulations, until they are finally ready for the launch pad.

As Prof Susskind points out, law students at the University of Strathclyde play out real-world legal problems in a fictional virtual community called “Ardcalloch”.

In the real world, professionals must recognise much of the work they hand to juniors is repetitive servitude, often imposed on the tacit assumption that, if they had to do it, so should the new generation. Clients may still prefer dealing with human experts but they do not much like paying for their juniors’ billable training.

Knowledge can be imparted in other ways, including simply by working closely, apprentice-style, with senior colleagues. I still value the guidance I received as a beginner from experienced editors and writers but I am not sure I needed to write five similar corporate earnings stories a day to achieve mastery. Newbies can acquire specific skills through working, under close supervision, on a sample of the basic tasks they once spent years slogging through.

Meanwhile, new roles will evolve. The Susskinds suggest that one could be the “empathiser”. A sympathetic human may eventually act as assistant to Kim or Ross or their more cognitively capable descendants.

This prospect causes conniptions among some consultants and accountants. It may not happen at the top for years — or ever, in complex lawsuits or tax audits. But aspiring partners should start honing their listening skills, just in case.

California grants driver's licenses to 605,000 undocumented

Yahoo News | February 9, 2016

(AFP Photo/David McNew)


Los Angeles (AFP) - Some 605,000 undocumented immigrants who live in California were granted driver's licenses in 2015, the first year they have been able to enjoy that benefit, officials said Monday.


The law known as AB60 took effect on January 2, 2015. The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) expects a total of about 1.4 million people will get their license under the law by late 2017.

Governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, signed the law in October 2013 to give a legal document to the 2.5 million undocumented immigrants in California alone -- most from Latin America and particularly neighboring Mexico.

California officials believe the program -- which does not give license holders any US federal benefits -- does make roads in the most populous US state safer, several state sources said.

It does not allow license holders, for example, the right to fly on airplanes inside the United States, nor does it give anyone legal residency status, the right to work or to seek a US passport.

But among the upsides are that California drivers with the document can drive legally across the entire vast United States, without being fined or facing fear of having their vehicle impounded.

"If you can approve policies that integrate immigrants, I think it's a win-win for all people in a big state like California," said Luis Alejo, a California Assembly Member and author of the bill.

A total of 12 of the 50 US states plus the federal capital Washington have similar driver's license laws for undocumented immigrants.

Monday, February 8, 2016

Greek stock market falls sharply on banking sector meltdown

Yahoo News | February 8, 2016




Athens (AFP) - Bank shares crashed on the Athens stock exchange Monday, losing a fifth of their value within hours, as the government was seen facing an impossible choice between further austerity and social unrest.


Related Stories

Skirmishes in Athens as general strike sweeps Greece AFP
Greek police turn to teargas as tempers flare over pensions Reuters
Greek professionals stage 'necktie protest' over pensions AFP
Thousands of Greek farmers protest against pension reform AFP
Protests, EU demands add pressure on Greece's Tsipras Associated Press
$70/Month Is Too Much For Auto Insurance Sponsored

The FTSEB index of financial stocks was down over 20 percent in midday trading, helping pull the overall market index more than 7 percent lower.

The Athens stock exchange had already lost 8.89 percent of its value last week, with the banking index taking a beating with a drop of 24.3 percent.

The main banks had gained a little ground after receiving a recapitalisation boost in December, six months after a disastrous tug-of-war between the leftist government of Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras and Greece's EU-IMF creditors forced the imposition of capital controls and nearly wiped out the value of their shares.

Greece last week wrapped the first phase of a fiscal review by its EU-IMF international creditors, with no agreement in sight on a controversial pension reform that has caused a social backlash against Tsipras' fragile coalition.

German business daily Handelsblatt over the weekend cited a source close to the talks saying that "Greece was doing a lot on paper" but less on the application front.

Leftist daily Avgi, which is close to the government, on Sunday said there were "many and significant" difficulties in reaching an agreement on Greece's fiscal targets for 2017 and 2018.

These include a gap of 800 million euros ($872 million) and disagreements over how to handle the mountain of bad loans weighing down Greek banks.

Protests are mounting against Tsipras's government -- which aims to slash maximum pensions -- with a general strike held last week and farmers intermittently blocking national highways and border crossings for the past three weeks.

The prime minister has a majority of just 153 deputies in the 300-seat parliament with which to secure passage of the pension bill later this month.

Russian Hackers Moved Currency Rate With Malware, Group-IB Says

Bloomberg | Jake Rudnitsky & Ilya Khrennikov | February 8, 2016 — 5:42 AM EST



Hackers used malware to penetrate the defenses of a Russian regional bank and move the ruble-dollar rate more than 15 percent in minutes, according to a Moscow-based cyber-security firm hired to investigate the attack.


Russian-language hackers deployed a virus known as the Corkow Trojan to infect Kazan-based Energobank and place more than $500 million in orders at non-market rates in February 2015, Group-IB told Bloomberg, without identifying individuals behind the attack. The resulting rate swing prompted a Russian central bank investigation last year into potential market manipulation.

Malicious software of the type used in the attack can open a back door into computers via seemingly legitimate websites or files and then force them to carry out hackers’ orders. Corkow, which regularly updates itself to evade detection by anti-virus programs, has infiltrated 250,000 computers worldwide and infected more than 100 financial institutions, according to Group-IB, which investigated the attack on behalf of Energobank.

“This is the first documented attack using this virus and it has potential to do much more damage,” Dmitry Volkov, the head of Group-IB’s cyber intelligence department, said by phone. “Once the malware has penetrated a local network, it is sophisticated enough to infect computers that are even not connected to the Internet.”

The Moscow Exchange has said its systems were not hacked in the incident on Feb. 27, 2015. In a separate investigation, the central bank said it found no evidence of currency market manipulation, noting the fluctuations could have been caused by traders’ mistakes.

The volatility lasted 14 minutes and caused the exchange rate to swing between 55 and 66 rubles per dollar, which “significantly differed from the prevailing market rate,” the central bank said in a statement on Dec. 17.

The bank claimed losses of 244 million rubles ($3.2 million) due to the trades, Vedomosti newspaper reported last year, citing a suit filed by Energobank in a Kazan court. There is no evidence that the hackers profited from the operation and it may have been a test to prepare for future attacks, according to Group-IB.

Energobank, the exchange and the central bank did not respond to e-mailed queries.

The virus was also used in an attack on a Russian bank card system that resulted in hundreds of millions of rubles being stolen via ATMs in August, Group-IB said.

Friday, February 5, 2016

Citi: World economy trapped in ‘death spiral’

NBCKaty Barnato | February 5, 2016

Ivan Bliznetsov | Getty Images



The global economy seems trapped in a "death spiral" that could lead to further weakness in oil prices, recession and a serious equity bear market, Citi strategists have warned.


Some analysts — including those at Citi — have turned bearish on the world economy this year, following an equity rout in January and weaker economic data out of China and the U.S.

"The world appears to be trapped in a circular reference death spiral," Citi strategists led by Jonathan Stubbs said in a report on Thursday.

"Stronger U.S. dollar, weaker oil/commodity prices, weaker world trade/petrodollar liquidity, weaker EM (and global growth)... and repeat. Ad infinitum, this would lead to Oilmageddon, a 'significant and synchronized' global recession and a proper modern-day equity bear market."

Stubbs said that macro strategists at Citi forecast that the dollar would weaken in 2016 and that oil prices were likely bottoming, potentially providing some light at the end of the tunnel.

"The death spiral is in nobody's interest. Rational behavior, most likely, will prevail," he said in the report.

Crude oil prices have tumbled by around 70 percent since the middle of 2014, during which time the U.S. dollar has risen by around 20 percent against a basket of currencies.

The world economy grew by 3.1 percent in 2015 and is projected to accelerate to expand by 3.4 percent in 2016 and 3.6 percent in 2017, according to the International Monetary Fund. The forecast reflects expectations of gradual improvement in countries currently in economic distress, notably Brazil, Russia and some in the Middle East.

By contrast, Citi forecasts the world economy will grow by only 2.7 percent in 2016 having cut its outlook last month.

Overall, advanced economies are mostly making a modest recovery, while many emerging market and developing economies are under strain from the rebalancing of the Chinese economy, lower commodity prices and capital outflows.

Stubbs added that policymakers would likely attempt to "regain credibility" in the coming weeks and months.

"This is fundamental to avoiding a proper/full global recession and dangerous disorder across financial markets. The stakes are high, perhaps higher than they have ever been in the post-World War II era," he said.

Just 151,000 new jobs were created in January in the U.S., in the latest sign that the world's biggest economy is slowing. Economists are concerned about an industrial or manufacturing recession in the country, following some warnings from companies in earnings seasons and recent weak manufacturing activity and durable goods orders data.

However, some analysts say markets are overegging the prospect of a global slump.

"Many markets are now pricing in a significant probability of recession and when we talk about recession, we're talking particularly about a U.S. recession. Do you think that is likely or not? To me, the odds are too high; the market is pricing too high a probability," Myles Bradshaw, the head of global aggregate fixed income at Amundi, told CNBC this week.



Thursday, February 4, 2016

Wells Fargo Insider Says Bank Is Preparing For Emergency Scenario

Investment Watch | by Sean Adl-Tabatabai | February 4, 2016




A Wells Fargo bank insider, who claims to be a teller, has said that the bank are training their staff to deal with an imminent “emergency scenario”.


The insider reports:

I am a teller at Wells Fargo here in the US this is also my first time using this proxy.

They started training us today for a bank holiday. They didnt mention the word bank holiday, but they did train us for an “emergency scenario”. They told us it’s just a drill. Ive been working here for 3 years, and we never had a drill before..

They said that during an emergency, they would close the doors and only allow 3 people at a time inside of the branch. Also, my branch manager said that we would have armed guards during the emergency.

The last thing they mentioned is that they wont store alot of cash in the vault, since it will be a safety issue….

just wanted to share this with you guys.

Superstation95.com reports:

A call by SuperStation95 to Wells Fargo Corporate Headquarters in San Francisco to verify these claims was met with a terse “no comment.”

Interpretation


If taken at face value and believed, why would Wells Fargo be doing this? What “emergency” could take place that might cause people to swarm to a bank in such numbers that they would have to lock the bank and only allow three customers in at a time?

A bank collapse? An economic collapse? a Currency collapse?

None of these things would be good and if the claims above are true, it is a dangerous signal to the rest of us to get some money out to tie-us-over for a month or so in the event everything shuts down.

In a banking emergency, CREDIT AND DEBIT CARDS WILL NOT WORK. ATM’s will not work. Banks will be closed so that you cannot even enter your own safe deposit box.

Do you have enough cash money on-hand to get through for a couple weeks operating solely on cash? If not, you’d better get that taken care of — fast.

We’re not even talking about making payments on your debts during that time, but rather only using the cash to get food, fuel and such to live! Could you make-it for a month without access to any financial tools or bank cash?

Do you have spare food in the house if stores stop taking credit cards- or the cards don’t work? How will you eat if everything remains cash-only for a month?

These are legitimate questions you should be asking yourself right now. Time may be very short. An economic collapse would take place with lightning speed and by the time you realize what’s happening, people will already be storming the banks and supermarkets trying to stock-up. Waiting until it actually happens is waiting too long; you’ll be too late.

A word to the wise: Prepare.


$19 Trillion and Counting: The Dangers of Unlimited Debt

Veronique de Rugy | Reason - FEBRUARY 4, 2016




The statutory limit on how much debt the federal government can accumulate is back in the news, but this time it's not because Washington is close to breaching it. That's not a present concern thanks to the year-end bipartisan spending spree that included a suspension of the debt limit until March 2017. The news is that a report from the House Financial Services Committee found that the Obama administration's Treasury Department has been repeatedly misleading the American public on the matter.


Treasury has routinely rejected the idea that once the government reaches the debt limit, federal spending could be prioritized to avoid a default. During a previous debate over the debt limit in 2011, my colleague Jason Fichtner and I wrote a paper explaining that even if Treasury is unable to issue more debt, it can still avoid a default and thus give policymakers more time to implement reforms that would put the government on a more sustainable fiscal path.

Contrary to Treasury's claims, we argued that it has several financial management options to continue paying the government's primary obligations. Specifically, Treasury could use incoming tax receipts to cover high priority claims including the interest on existing debt, the principal on that debt, Social Security benefits, and more. Government assets could also be liquidated to pay bills.

Treasury claimed that such options were neither acceptable nor feasible, and thus the only choice was for Congress to promptly agree to increase the debt limit. Then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner claimed that prioritizing was out of the question and that failing to pay any of the government's bills would be the equivalent of defaulting on the debt. The same thing happened again during the administration's 2013 showdown with Congress over lifting the debt limit. This time it was Geithner's replacement, Jacob Lew, claiming that prioritization was not an option.

We now know that the administration's claims were untrue. As it turns out, documents subpoenaed by the House Financial Services Committee reveal that during the 2013 debt ceiling debate the Obama administration knew it was actually capable of prioritizing payments. Indeed, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was conducting "tabletop exercises" in preparation for what the administration was publicly stating couldn't be done. The documents show that while Treasury was helping the administration scare the public, its behind-the-scenes actions proved otherwise.

While Treasury and the administration's deceptive behavior is disturbing, it's good news for the next battle over lifting the debt limit early next year. I have repeatedly made it clear in the past that I believe defaulting on the debt is not an acceptable option. However, continuing to raise the debt limit without making any substantive changes to the unsustainable financial path we are on is just as irresponsible. Under the watch of both Republicans and Democrats, the debt limit has been raised 20 times since 1993. The result is that the federal debt has ballooned from less than $5 trillion in 1993 to $19 trillion and counting today.

Deficits are also going back up thanks to a bipartisan inability to get spending under control. According to the Congressional Budget Office's latest projections, cumulative annual budget deficits will add another $9.4 trillion in debt to the federal government's mountain of red ink. That figure is $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected less than six months ago.

Will Rogers once said, "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging." Policymakers need to stop digging and instead implement institutional reforms that constrain government spending, which is the underlying cause of the mounting debt. Indeed, that should be a precondition to raising the debt limit next year. And this time we will know that Treasury has the means to give Congress the time to finally get it done.

COPYRIGHT 2016 CREATORS.COM

The Secretive Hedge Fund That's Generating Huge Profits for Yale

Bloomberg | By Sabrina Willmer & Tom Moroney | February 4, 2016 — 5:00 AM EST

Yale University. IMAGE CREDIT: Flickr


In a year when titans Bill Ackman and David Einhorn each lost more than 20 percent for their investors, David Swensen’s bet on a little-known hedge fund kept making him money.


Nancy Zimmerman’s Bracebridge Capital has gone from $5.8 billion in assets four years ago to $10.3 billion today with a return of about 10 percent a year since its inception. That makes it the largest hedge fund in the world run by a woman. Zimmerman, who survived a 1990s scandal involving Russia, her husband and Harvard University, is so successful at avoiding the limelight that Leda Braga’s $9.5 billion Systematica Investments Ltd. is often cited as the top woman-led firm by assets.

David Swensen 
Photographer: Peter Foley/Bloomberg
Swensen, who runs Yale University’s $25.6 billion endowment, and Thomas Steyer of Farallon Capital Management originally staked Zimmerman in 1994 with about $50 million. Yale’s investment now is valued at around $1 billion, making it one of the endowment’s most profitable.


“She’s employing this leveraged strategy to exploit pricing differentials in the fixed-income world with an obsessive focus on risk,” Swensen said in an interview.

Bracebridge has had only eight losing months since 2009. The fund’s 2 percent gain last year eclipsed the industry, which was up 0.6 percent on average, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Hedge funds had trouble navigating unexpected market events, including a devaluation in the Chinese currency in August, a rally in European government bonds and a steep drop in oil prices.

Ackman’s Pershing Square Holdings, the publicly traded part of his activist hedge fund, lost 20.5 percent last year, hurt in part by a drop in the shares of drugmaker Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital suffered the second losing year in its history, with its main fund falling 20.4 percent due to wrong-way stock picks.

“There were a lot of gopher holes that you could step in,” said Gabriel Sunshine, Zimmerman’s partner at Bracebridge. “We managed to miss most of them.’’

Heavyweight Network


Zimmerman, 52, has a powerful network of allies, including former New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, who was Zimmerman’s boss at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., where he was co-chief executive officer. Among her top investors is Princeton University’s endowment, run by Swensen protege Andrew Golden.

Corzine said he remembers Zimmerman as a brilliant trader who attracted the brightest of co-workers.

Bracebridge is a relative-value fixed-income fund that exploits small pricing differences in the credit market and hedges against those bets.

Zimmerman offered a typical scenario: Bracebridge buys a corporate bond it considers cheap while at the same time purchasing a credit-default swap on the bond in order to make money even if the company goes bankrupt. Leverage boosts returns.

The strategy hasn’t always come up roses. Long-Term Capital Management, a highly leveraged hedge fund run by John Meriwether, pursued a similar investment approach. In 1998, after Russia stiffed lenders including LTCM, the fund failed and was bailed out by its Wall Street competitors. The demise of LTCM hit other hedge funds, including Bracebridge, which held some of the same assets. Bracebridge lost about 26 percent, making it the worst year in its history.
Russian Economy

A few years prior, in 1992, Zimmerman’s husband, Harvard economist Andrei Shleifer, signed on to help privatize the Russian economy under the auspices of the university and the U.S. government. Zimmerman bought up beleaguered Russian debt, betting its value would rise, court filings show.

Complaints arose about Shleifer and his business partner allegedly using their position and influence for personal gain, according to court documents. Harvard, Shleifer and the U.S. Justice Department eventually reached an agreement in which the university paid $26.5 million to settle a civil lawsuit and Shleifer paid $2 million. Zimmerman’s company paid $1.5 million to resolve civil claims that it improperly used resources and staff from the government-funded project.

Neither Zimmerman nor her husband admitted wrongdoing in connection with their Russia dealings.

Zimmerman was born and raised just north of Chicago in Skokie, Illinois, the youngest of two girls. While attending Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, she worked summers at O’Connor & Associates, a Chicago derivatives-trading firm. She stayed with them for three years after graduation, on the raucous floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Her first job was buying Japanese yen options, she said.

She stands a few inches over five feet with brown hair that she sometimes tucks behind her ears. Though her roots are in the Midwest, she’s a Bostonian now, relishing Red Sox games and working behind the scenes for a number of the city’s philanthropies.

Zimmerman downplays the challenges faced by women in a male-dominated industry: “The bonds don’t know who owns them.”
Cashed Out

Initially, Zimmerman and Sunshine partnered with Steyer’s Farallon, which bought a minority stake in the new management company they called Farallon Fixed Income Associates. They had one employee.

Steyer cashed out after the Russia episode, but Swensen stuck with Bracebridge. “We took a hard look and found no reason to modify our relationship,” said Swensen, who describes himself as a close friend of Zimmerman’s.

After cutting ties with Farallon and changing its name, Bracebridge ended 1999 with $600 million under management.

Bracebridge’s biggest turnaround came in 2009. After losing 18 percent in the global financial crisis, it posted a 35 percent gain. That surpassed the 25.8 percent return on the HFRI Relative Value index.

Zimmerman owns most of Bracebridge, according to a 2015 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. As for the value, the document only says she and Sunshine control 12.6 percent of the assets. Of the $10.3 billion, that’s about $1.3 billion. It’s split between her and Sunshine and their partners, Zimmerman said, declining to be more specific.

Zimmerman credited her more than 100 employees for the firm’s success. “I’m very proud of the people who come to work here,” she said. “They are focused, intellectually honest and they love to collaborate.”


Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Why Bernie Sanders Has to Raise Taxes on the Middle Class

Daniel Bier | The Foundation for Economic Education | FEBRUARY 3, 2016


IMAGE CREDITS: WIKIMEDIA COMMONS.


Willie Sutton was one of the most infamous bank robbers in American history. Over three decades, the dashing criminal robbed a hundred banks, escaped three prisons, and made off with millions. Today, he is best known for Sutton’s Law: Asked by a reporter why he robbed banks, Sutton allegedly quipped, “Because that’s where the money is.”


Sutton’s Law explains something unusual about Bernie Sander’s tax plan: it calls for massive tax hikes across the board. Why raise taxes on the middle class? Because that’s where the money is.

The problem all politicians face is that voters love to get stuff, but they hate to pay for it. The traditional solution that center-left politicians pitch is the idea that the poor and middle class will get the benefits, and the rich will pay for it.

This is approximately how things work in the United States. The top 1 percent of taxpayers earn 19 percent of total income and pay 38 percent of federal income taxes. The bottom 50 percent earn 12 percent and pay 3 percent. This chart from the Heritage Foundation shows net taxes paid and benefits received, per person, by household income group:


But Sanders’ proposals (free college, free health care, jobs programs, more Social Security, etc.) are way too heavy for the rich alone to carry, and he knows it. To his credit, his campaign has released a plan to pay for each of these myriad handouts. Vox’s Dylan Matthews has totaled up all the tax increases Sanders has proposed so far, and the picture is simply staggering.

Every household earning below $250,000 will face a tax hike of nearly 9 percent. Past that, rates explode, up to a top rate of 77 percent on incomes over $10 million.



Paying for Free


Sanders argues that most people’s average income tax rate won’t change, but this is only true if you exclude the two major taxes meant to pay for his health care program: a 2.2 percent “premium” tax and 6.2 percent payroll tax, imposed on incomes across the board. These taxes account for majority of the new revenue Sanders is counting on.

But it gets worse: his single-payer health care plan will cost 80 percent more than he claims. Analysis by the left-leaning scholar Kenneth Thorpe (who supports single payer) concludes that Sanders’ proposal will cost $1.1 trillion more each year than he claims. The trillion dollar discrepancy results from some questionable assumptions in Sanders’ numbers. For instance:

Sanders assumes $324 billion more per year in prescription drug savings than Thorpe does. Thorpe argues that this is wildly implausible.
“In 2014 private health plans paid a TOTAL of $132 billion on prescription drugs and nationally we spent $305 billion,” he writes in an email. “With their savings drug spending nationally would be negative.”
So unless pharmaceutical companies start paying you to take their drugs, the Sanders administration will need to increase taxes even more.

Analysis by the Tax Foundation finds that his proposed tax hikes already total $13.6 trillion over the next ten years. However, “the plan would [only] end up collecting $9.8 trillion over the next decade when accounting for decreased economic output.”

And the consequences will be truly devastating. Because of the taxes on labor and capital, GDP will be reduced 9.5 percent. Six million jobs will be lost. On average, after-tax incomes will be reduced by more than 18 percent.

Incomes for the bottom 50 percent will be reduced by more than 14 percent, and incomes for the top 1 percent will be reduced nearly 25 percent. Inequality warriors might cheer, but if you want to actually raise revenue, crushing the incomes of the people who pay almost 40 percent of all taxes isn’t the way to go.

These are just the effects of the $1 trillion tax hike he has planned — and he probably needs to double that to pay for single payer. Where will he find it? He’ll go where European welfare states go.

Being Like Scandinavia


Sanders is a great admirer of Scandinavian countries, such as Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and many of his proposals are modeled on their systems. But to pay for their generous welfare benefits, they tax, and tax, and tax.

Denmark, Norway, and Sweden all capture between 20-26 percent of GDP from income and payroll taxes. By contrast, the United States collects only 15 percent.

Scandinavia’s tax rates themselves are not that much higher than the United States’. Denmark’s top rate is 30 percent higher, Sweden’s is 18 percent higher, and Norway’s is actually 16 percent lower — and yet Norway’s income tax raises 30 percent more revenue than the United States.

The answer lies in how progressive the US tax system is, in the thresholds at which people are hit by the top tax rates. The Tax Foundation explains,
Scandinavian income taxes raise a lot of revenue because they are actually rather flat. In other words, they tax most people at these high rates, not just high-income taxpayers.
The top marginal tax rate of 60 percent in Denmark applies to all income over 1.2 times the average income in Denmark. From the American perspective, this means that all income over $60,000 (1.2 times the average income of about $50,000 in the United States) would be taxed at 60 percent. …
Compare this to the United States. The top marginal tax rate of 46.8 percent (state average and federal combined rates) kicks in at 8.5 times the average U.S. income (around $400,000). Comparatively, few taxpayers in the United States face the top marginal rate.
The reason European states can pay for giant welfare programs is not because they just tax the rich more — it’s because they also scoop up a ton of middle class income. The reason why the United States can’t right now is its long-standing political arrangement to keep taxes high on the rich so they can be low on the poor and middle.


Where the Money Is – And Isn’t


As shown by the Laffer Curve, there is a point at which increasing tax rates actually reduces tax revenue, by discouraging work, hurting the economy, and encouraging tax avoidance.


Bernie’s plan already hammers the rich: households earning over $250,000 (the top 3 percent) would face marginal rates of 62-77 percent — meaning the IRS would take two-thirds to three-quarters of each additional dollar earned. His proposed capital gains taxes are so high that they are likely well past the point of positive returns. The US corporate tax rate of 40 percent is already the highest in the world, and even Sanders hasn’t proposed increasing it.

The only way to solve his revenue problem is to raise rates on the middle and upper-middle classes, or flatten the structure to make the top rates start kicking in much lower. You can see why a “progressive” isn’t keen on making more regressive taxes part of his platform, but the money has to come from somewhere.

The bottom fifty percent don’t pay much income tax now (only $34 billion), but they also don’t earn enough to fill the gap. Making their taxes proportionate to income would only raise $107 billion, without even considering how the higher rates would reduce employment and income.

The top 5 percent are pretty well wrung dry by Sanders’ plan, and their incomes are going to be reduced by 20-25 percent anyway. It’s hard to imagine that there’s much more blood to be had from that stone.

But households between the 50th and the 95th percentile (incomes between $37,000 to $180,000 a year) earn about 54 percent of total income — a share would likely go up, given the larger income reductions expected for top earners. Currently, this group pays only 38 percent of total income taxes, and, despite the 9 percent tax hike, they’re comparatively spared by the original tax plan. Their incomes are now the lowest hanging fruit on the tax tree.

As they go to the polls this year, the middle class should remember Sutton’s Law.

These four-foot-tall robots could change the way warehouse workers do their jobs

Tech Insider | Leanna Garfield | Feb 2, 2016

Locus Robotics

The Locus robot can zip around a clothing warehouse larger than the size of six football fields. It can also work for 24 hours, without a break for lunch or a salary.


The new bot, created by Locus Robotics, just launched in its first warehouse: a Devens, Massachusetts space owned by Quiet Logistics, a warehousing company that fills online orders for both small startups and megabrands like Zara and Bonobos. The robots transport items that have been picked off the shelves by humans, and bring them to the front of the warehouse to be sealed and delivered.

"We developed a system where the robots do all the walking," Locus Robotics CEO Bruce Welty tells Tech Insider. "As retailers continue to exceed expectation around next-day shipping, they're going to look to technology to help them provide an even faster turn-around."

The bots work alongside humans and do all the normal grunt work. Warehouse workers usually walk 12 to 16 miles each day. With the robots, they don't have to.

The robots now meet the human workers in the middle of the warehouse. As soon as someone completes an order online, the bot's system knows exactly where to go in the 275,000-square-foot warehouse.

Each bot (which doesn't look anything like a human) has a platform for arms and a two-foot-diameter base with wheels for feet. It zips around at about 4.5 mph, or the equivalent of a fast walk. If stray boxes or wires stand in its path, its vision technology can "see" in real-time to avoid them.

locus robot picking
Locus Robotics

Since the robots are able to move faster than humans without tiring, Welty says the system will boost warehouse productivity by up to 800%. The bots will also not be subject to human error, which means that they can get the order right nearly every time.

As a way to increase productivity and speed, many online retailers have been using robots, conveyor belts, and cranes to fulfill orders for the past decade. Amazon has exclusive rightsto Kiva Systems' robots, but Welty says Locus' robots are smaller, and more lightweight and versatile.

Unlike Kiva's bots, the Locus robots can be incorporated into the warehouses' existing infrastructure. The warehouse doesn't need to move any shelves or aisles. Locus can program the robot to navigate the warehouse exactly how it is.
locus robot 1Locus Robotics
"The robots are less industrial and easier to work side-by-side with humans," Welty says.

The robots won't replace any human jobs in Quiet Logistics' warehouse, at least for the time being. It will change the nature of many of their responsibilities, however. Since they don't need to roam the warehouse's aisles looking for the items, they can use that time for other parts of the distribution process. They can now do what they do best: add a personal touch.

As more retailers shift online and promise greater shipping speeds, there's a growing need to make sure that the orders are not only delivered on-time but also feel personalized. This can be as simple as stuffing boxes with pretty tissue paper or even handwritten notes from the brands — a job fit best for humans.